Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Dimir Control , Esper Pixie , Grixis Reanimator , Gruul Leyline
Meta Performance Analysis
Ad Nauseam ranks #4780 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 93%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Ad Nauseam is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 0.00 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 48.1%. Ad Nauseam has a win rate of 45.6%, making it 5.2% worse than other 5-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Necropotence | Enchantment | 5 | 46.9% | 0 |
| Brainstorm | Instant | 6 | 46.7% | 0 |
| Diabolic Intent | Sorcery | 6 | 44.9% | 0 |
| Archivist of Oghma | Creature — Halfling Cleric | 6 | 42.1% | 0 |
| Silence | Instant | 10 | 39.0% | 0 |
| Praetor's Grasp | Sorcery | 5 | 38.9% | 0 |
| Dauthi Voidwalker | Creature — Dauthi Rogue | 9 | 37.8% | 0 |
| Grafdigger's Cage | Artifact | 5 | 37.5% | 0 |
| Dispel | Instant | 5 | 37.5% | 0 |
| Grand Abolisher | Creature — Human Cleric | 10 | 36.5% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Ad Nauseam than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dauthi Voidwalker | Creature — Dauthi Rogue | 2 | 7 | 52.3% | 48.8% | +3.5% |
| Swords to Plowshares | Instant | 1 | 6 | 52.8% | 49.5% | +3.2% |
| Grand Abolisher | Creature — Human Cleric | 2 | 7 | 52.3% | 49.5% | +2.7% |
| Silence | Instant | 1 | 8 | 52.2% | 50.0% | +2.2% |
| Talisman of Dominance | Artifact | 2 | 7 | 48.6% | 46.5% | +2.2% |
| Brainstorm | Instant | 1 | 5 | 52.9% | 50.9% | +2.0% |
| Wishclaw Talisman | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 46.7% | 44.9% | +1.8% |
| Opposition Agent | Creature — Human Rogue | 3 | 8 | 51.1% | 49.8% | +1.3% |
| Archivist of Oghma | Creature — Halfling Cleric | 2 | 5 | 51.4% | 50.4% | +1.0% |
| Talisman of Progress | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 50.0% | 49.3% | +0.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 13 | 0.7% | 33.2% |
| Dimir Control | 1 | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Grixis Reanimator | 1 | 100.0% | 40.0% |
| Gruul Leyline | 1 | 0.4% | 50.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.